Although it is sometimes referred to as mercy killings, it is one of the most controversial topics in our world today. Many believe the right to live is one of the most important human rights. The right to die should be equally as important. First, we must discuss the difference between active and passive euthanasia.
Pro Euthanasia Arguments Essay Modern world is full of sufferings and pain. In the light of this situation, the problem of euthanasia is of current importance. For the last twenty years, euthanasia has been a subject of much controversy. Doctors, scientists, politicians and representatives of different confessions discuss the possibility of legitimating euthanasia.
Various countries take opposite sides and either allow euthanasia or prohibit it. However, I would like to support euthanasia and, with the help of this paper, to argue in favor of it. It is necessary to note that there are several types of euthanasia.
Passive euthanasia is already widespread in hospitals and is nothing but the impossibility to cure a person and attempts to alleviate the sufferings with the help of narcotics or the cessation of therapy because of its futility.
While passive euthanasia is legally used in hospitals, the application of non-aggressive euthanasia is constantly debated. In the case when the euthanasia may be voluntary, I would like to highlight the human right to be in charge of their life. Sick bedridden people are already bereft of all rights; they feel a burden for their relatives.
Humble and disabled, they want at least to leave this world peacefully and to die with dignity. Even criminals have a right for their last wish; frankly speaking, it is our duty to fulfill the last wish of sick patients. So, thus we incite them to a great sin and crime.
Besides, a man is created for life, and all of us have the instinct of self-preservation, only people driven to despair by their disease, can ask for death and it is their right.
It is necessary to realize how horrible it is to live, being conscious of the forthcoming death. Most people cannot overcome this pressure and lose the sense of life, burdening their own life and the life of their relatives as well.
In cases of inability of patients to express their will, euthanasia is also possible and is justified. Then the decision should be taken by the relatives, who are responsible for that.
Often it is obvious that the patient is doomed to death and has no chances to survive. Still, relatives have to provide all necessary medicines and to pay for places in hospital.
Many families spend their last money on the treatment that is vain. Another possible reason for the justifying of euthanasia is the lack of space in hospitals for those who can be cured and saved. It is bitter to acknowledge it, but this problem exists in many countries.
Those who want to live have no chance to get the proper treatment and care while those who want to die cannot give their place to them. In fact, I suppose the greatest problem of this controversial point is the inability of the government to implement a thoroughly made law that can foresee all the possible problems of the legalization of euthanasia and avoid them.
To make a conclusion, I am sure that euthanasia has the right to exist in our society. It should be considered not as a murder but as an absolute necessity in urgent situations. Euthanasia and the Right to Die.
Report of the Select Committee on Medical Ethics. SessionHL Paper I.
London, HMSO, 4. Euthanasia — a critique. N Engl J Med If you are looking for a reliable paper writing service, Professay.This essay digs into this evolutionary process of voluntary euthanasia evolving into the non-voluntary type. Advocates of legalised euthanasia almost always insist that they only want voluntary euthanasia (VE) - a they say they are as opposed to the taking of life without the subject's knowledge or consent, that is, non-voluntary euthanasia.
This essay has been submitted by a law student. This is not an example of the work written by our professional essay writers.
Life or death Euthanasia arguments for and against. Many supporters of voluntary euthanasia believe that everyone has the right to control their body and life, and should be free to decide at what time, and in.
This essay will only focus on ethical arguments as to whether voluntary euthanasia and non-voluntary should be legalised.
One argument for euthanasia is the utilitarian principle which says that the lives of some people can be sacrificed for the benefit of others deemed more worthy of care. Disclaimer: This essay has been submitted by a student.
This is not an example of the work written by our professional essay writers. You can view samples of our professional work here. Any opinions, findings, conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the authors and do.
Voluntary Active Euthanasia This paper will discuss the benefits of Active Voluntary Euthanasia (VAE). Although it is sometimes referred to as mercy killings, it is one of the most controversial topics in our world today. Many believe the right to live is one of the most important human rights.
The right to die should be equally as important. This essay has been submitted by a law student. This is not an example of the work written by our professional essay writers. Voluntary Euthanasia | Free Criminal Law Essay.
* Voluntary euthanasia: When the person who is killed gives consent to be killed. * Involuntary euthanasia: When the person who is killed is incapable of giving consent or does not give consent. Assisted suicide: Someone provides an individual with the information, guidance, and means to . Although some view euthanasia to be morally wrong, voluntary euthanasia should be legalized in the United States to end the suffering of others, help patients who have the ability to live a longer life, and decrease the cost of health care. Legalizing Voluntary Euthanasia Essay Words | 4 Pages. Today, voluntary euthanasia is getting closer to being legalized in more than just one state in the United States. “‘Voluntary’ euthanasia means that the act of putting the person to death is the end result of the person’s own free will” (Bender 19).