Department members responding as assist units will activate the BWC for all of the above-listed incidents.
Tony Colwell - 16 September After the lull of the holiday season the Interim Management community has shown renewed interest in subject of "Catch 22" - the Cabinet Office's constraints on public sector deployment of Interim Managers. The discussion had turned negative and a new direction, leading to some positive action, was called for.
Because this is a closed Group, I thought it would be appropriate to reproduce my comment, which with minor editing was as follows. This [Odgers Interim Management] discussion thread started on 3rd June. Alf Oldman and I had a meeting with the Cabinet Office on 1 July at which we were informed of plans to introduce new framework agreements to cover consultancy and executive interim requirements.
We were not bound by non-disclosure agreement; it is more out of regard for our professional integrity that we have not broadcast plans that the Cabinet Office has chosen not to announce formally.
It might be helpful, to take the debate forward in a constructive manner, to disclose some of what we know.
The meeting dispelled a few myths surrounding "Catch 22". The Cabinet Office constraints on the use of 'consultants' applied to Central Government only. The use of consultants and interims by local authorities has been affected by budgetary constraints, not as far as I am aware by Central Government directive.
DWP Cipher - the outsourced Capita supply model; 2. I am not clear it was mandated that the Cabinet Office would have to approve such business cases. Besides, the freedom to use "any other option" gives enormous scope, especially in light of the Public Accounts Committee's findings that the Cabinet Office is incapable of assessing value.
Cabinet Office and formerly Buying Solutions' frameworks - of which there are currently 19 active - have never been mandated, and neither will they be. That the Cabinet Office should be seen to prevent Central Government departments, or local authorities, from discharging their responsibilities is clearly unwise both politically and in terms of maintaining managerial accountability.
The proposed new frameworks are to fall within two distinct categories: Executive interim will not be classified as contingent labour, but 'handle-turning' contractors' roles will be. I feel it is inappropriate to comment on the dividing line in terms of day rates but it was clear to me that many existing public sector 'interims' will fall into the contingent labour category, including those working at rates above recognised as lower-limit thresholds by the two professional bodies, API and IIM.
This is to be welcomed. If the Cabinet Office delivers what Alf and I were told is planned, then the recognition of executive interim status and the crossover with, and alternative to, big consultancy will be addressed.
My focus since the meeting has been on the interim management supply model. The success of any new frameworks is entirely dependent on the outcome of the tendering process. The critical factors are a Cabinet Office recognition that best value does not equate to lowest Interim Service Provider's "ISP" margin, and b ISP's placing bids that demonstrate, can deliver, and can measure the added value of a higher-margin service.
The Cabinet Office is fully aware of the need to evaluate different interim management supply models.
To this end Alf and I produced a second White Paper which we have not published in the public domain. Much of the content regarding measuring the effectiveness of interim management supply models has been put to the IM community for discussion, both before and after we submitted the White Paper to the Cabinet Office.
Details can be found in my earlier blog. Disappointingly, these attracted only moderate interest and little comment from the ISPs themselves. Alf and I know from private discussions we had with various ISPs that more is going on behind the scenes than is apparent in the public domain.
I would expect some reticence to discuss publically what ISPs might be doing to establish their own positions and place their bids.
The future of the executive interim opportunity in Central Government departments is at stake. So perhaps this discussion should be redirected towards ensuring that ISPs provide the type of interim supply model that we executive interims would wish.
Business transformation typically involves people, process and systems changes which need to be delivered in order to produce a step change within the business.
The design of effective processes and application of appropriate technology is not enough to ensure success.Nov 09, · Balanced Scorecard and Supply Chain Management: A balance scorecard can also be aligned with some of the supply chain attributes to measure the performance of a complex supply chain.
SWOT Analysis SWOT analysis is a tool for auditing an organization and its environment. It is the first stage of planning and helps marketers to focus on key issues.
Oct 03, · (where the assessee has transferred an asset and the value of such an asset is less than the value adopted or assesseed or assessable by any . Nov 02, · If procurement executives don’t take intelligent risks, they cannot provide maximum value to their companies.
Here are five techniques to manage both anticipated and unanticipated events in the supply chain. How to Measure and Improve the Business Value of IT Service Phil Weinzimer Improving the value of services is all about understanding what the business is trying to accomplish and express it in business terms everyone can understand.
Supply Chain Excellence: A Handbook for Dramatic Improvement Using the SCOR Model [Peter Bolstorff, Robert Rosenbaum] on timberdesignmag.com *FREE* shipping on qualifying offers. To keep your sales, manufacturing, distribution, and inventory moving in perfect synchronization, you need a flawless.