An Alternative Theory of Justice? Nevertheless, it has also been criticized by many others on different grounds; one criticism shared by may of his critics is the way Amartya Sen interpreted Rawls is at least partially wrong, and accordingly, some of his criticisms against Rawls are superficial Riley ; Shapiro ; Valentini In this paper, my primary aim is to assess to what extent Sen has been successful to bring about an alterantive theory of justice; however, as many of the critics have done I will not focus on Sen's interpretation and criticisms of Rawls but instead evaluate major strengths and shortcomings of Sen's own theory as a whole. After a short review of Sen's key arguments in the book, I will concentrate on two major subjects that appear in the book whose analysis that I find to be crucial for a better understanding of Sen's theory of justice.
Sen's family was from Wari and ManikganjDhakaboth in present-day Bangladesh. His father Ashutosh Sen was a professor of chemistry at Dhaka University who moved with his family to West Bengal in and worked at various government institutions, including the West Bengal Public Service Commission of which he was the chairmanand the Union Public Service Commission.
Sen's mother Amita Sen was the daughter of Kshiti Mohan Sena well-known scholar of ancient and medieval India and close associate of Rabindranath Tagore.
Sen began his high-school education at St Gregory's School in Dhaka in From fallSen studied at Visva-Bharati University school.
He later went to Presidency College, Kolkatawhere earned a B. Inhe moved to Trinity College, Cambridgewhere he earned a second B.
He was elected President of the Cambridge Majlis. While Sen was officially a Ph. He served in that position, starting the new Economics Department, during to Meanwhile, Sen was elected to a Prize Fellowship at Trinity College, which gave him four years of freedom to do anything he liked; he made the radical decision to study philosophy.
That proved to be of immense help to his later research. To Sen, Cambridge was like a battlefield. There were major debates between supporters of Keynesian economics on the one hand, and the "neo-classical" economists skeptical of Keynes, on the other. Sen was lucky to have close relations with economists on both sides of the divide.
Meanwhile, thanks to its good "practice" of democratic and tolerant social choice, Sen's own college, Trinity College, was somewhat removed from the discord.
However, because of a lack of enthusiasm for social choice theory in both Trinity and Cambridge, Sen had to choose a different subject for his Ph. Dasguptagiven to Sen while teaching and revising his work at Jadavpur under the supervision of the "brilliant but vigorously intolerant" post-KeynesianJoan Robinson.
He taught as Professor of Economics between and at the Delhi School of Economics where he completed his magnum opus Collective Choice and Social Welfare by. Inhe joined the London School of Economics as a Professor of Economics where he taught until Inhe joined Harvard as the Thomas W.
Lamont University Professor of Economics. In he was appointed as Master of Trinity College, Cambridge. Membership and associations He has served as president of the Econometric Societythe International Economic Association —the Indian Economic Association and the American Economic Association Sen's contribution to the literature was to show under what conditions Arrow's impossibility theorem  would indeed come to pass as well as to extend and enrich the theory of social choice, informed by his interests in history of economic thought and philosophy.
InSen published Poverty and Famines: An Essay on Entitlement and Deprivationa book in which he argued that famine occurs not only from a lack of food, but from inequalities built into mechanisms for distributing food.Food security is a condition related to the availability of food, and individuals' accessibility and affordability to it.
There is evidence of being in use over 10, years ago, with central authorities in civilizations ancient China and ancient Egypt being known to release food from storage in times of famine. At the World Food Conference the term "food security" was defined with an.
Book: Inequality Reexamined. Author: Amartya Sen. The claims of equality in social arrangements are tested in Inequality Reexamined. Amartya Sen begins by identifying a common characteristic of virtually all the contemporary moral approaches to social arrangement.
Amartya Sen studies thoroughly what equality and inequality are in different circumstances. These are just a few of the many complex questions explored in "The Role of Freedom in Development: Prospects and Pitfalls of Sen's Capability Approach." Please read on.
Search Search. Close suggestions.
THE ROLE OF FREEDOM IN DEVELOPMENT: PROSPECTS AND PITFALLS OF SEN’S CAPABILITY APPROACH. Amartya (May ). “Equality of What. Amartya Sen's What is Equality? - I take up the "What is equality?" controversy begun by Amartya Sen in by critically considering utility (J. S. Mill), primary goods (John Rawls), property rights (John Roemer) and basic capabilities in terms of what is to be distributed according to principles and theories of .
Need writing the charter of rights and freedoms essay? Use our custom writing services or get access to database of free essays samples about the charter of rights and freedoms. In Amartya Sens essay, A World Not Neatly Divided, he states in his argument that, The main hope of harmony lies not in any imaginary uniformity, but in.
Get The Wall Street Journal’s Opinion columnists, editorials, op-eds, letters to the editor, and book and arts reviews.